วันจันทร์, พฤศจิกายน 23, 2563

แอนดรูว์ โพสต์เล่าเรื่อง ภาพเป็นร้อยๆที่เขาได้รับทางเมล เขาตัดสินใจที่จะไม่เผยแพร่ภาพหล่านี้ออกไป ซึ่งเป็นภาพ"ส่วนตัว"เอามากๆ เขาเชื่อว่ามันสะท้อนถึงความขัดแย้งภายในวัง


Andrew MacGregor Marshall
6h ·

Thailand's royal family is facing another embarrassing scandal following the leak of hundreds of intimate photographs of King Vajiralongkorn's official consort Sineenat "Koi" Wongvajirapakdi amid savage infighting among competing palace factions.
Three months ago, in August, a letter was sent to an address where I used to live, and was forwarded to me. Inside was a SD card with 1,443 photographs that had apparently been extracted from three iPhones that Koi used to own.
There were 942 photographs taken with an iPhone 4S and the metadata shows they were taken over the period of June 2012 to May 2013. There were 371 photographs taken with an iPhone 5S between May and September 2014, and 130 photographs taken with an iPhone 5 in November 2014.
The photographs are clearly from Koi's personal phones. Most of the images are photographs she took of herself, and dozens of them are sexually explicit. It seems probable that she had taken explicit photographs of herself to send to Vajiralongkorn.
The envelope had a fake return address — Gardenshutzenweg 71-101 in Berlin, which is an office of Germany's BND foreign intelligence agency. It also included a letter claiming that the images had been obtained by pro-democracy Thai hackers. However this is almost certainly untrue.
The photographs were sent to me shortly before Koi was released from Lat Yao women’s prison in Bangkok and returned to Munich on August 29 to rejoin Vajiralongkorn, with all her royal titles and privileges restored.
Koi's return was bitterly opposed by palace factions supporting Queen Suthida and Princess Bajrakitiyabha and it is highly probable the images of Koi were leaked in an effort to sabotage her return as Vajiralongkorn's consort.
This kind of thing has happened several times before in Thailand's royal family. When Vajiralongkorn expelled his second wife Yuvathida Polpraserth from Thailand in 1996, naked photographs of her were "sent by diskette to embassies and newspapers and posted on the Internet," according to Paul Handley in his book The King Never Smiles.
In 2007 a notorious video was leaked showing Vajiralongkorn's third wife Srirasmi semi-naked at her birthday party in 2001, and many naked photographs of Srirasmi have been leaked over the years. Explicit photographs of Vajiralongkorn and his current wife, Suthida, were also leaked a few years ago. And naked photographs of Vajiralongkorn's niece Ploypailin Jensen have been leaked too in unclear circumstances.
After receiving the photographs in August, I made the decision not to publish them, or even to publicly mention that I had received them. In my view, publishing intimate private photographs of Koi is an invasion of privacy that can't be justified in terms of providing significant valuable new information to the public.
Also, factions in the palace are playing a dangerous game that could lead to some people being jailed, tortured or even killed, and I don’t want to play any part in that game.
However, the photographs are now starting to be shared by others. Pavin Chachavalpongpun commented on October 25 that he had also received them, and since then he has shared several of the images, although so far none of the most explicit ones. Sources say some media organisations have also received the photographs and are likely to publish some of them soon.
So in these circumstances, I decided to explain what I know about the background of these leaked images, although I still will not be publishing them.
They show there is an ugly power struggle in the palace due to Vajiralongkorn's chronically complicated sex life, and the royal civil war is likely to get progressively worse as Suthida and Koi compete for status and attention.

https://www.facebook.com/zenjournalist/posts/10158360248046154
...
Chester Freeman
I agree that these images are personal and will add very little to course for democracy. I respect your decision not to publish them and be used as a tool in this ugly matter.