.....
ถาม AI Why marchado does not deserve noble prize?
Arguments against María Corina Machado deserving the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize largely focus on her past stances, alleged ties to certain foreign interests, and her long-standing reputation as an intransigent political figure. Critics question whether her actions align with the prize's purpose of promoting peace.
Objections to Machado's political history
- Support for the 2002 coup: Some critics argue that Machado was a supporter of the 2002 coup attempt against former Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez. Historian Greg Grandin has called her a "perplexing choice" for the prize, noting her alignment with the "most militarist and darkest face of U.S. imperialism".
- Lack of unifying action: Critics, such as Grandin, contend that Machado is not a unifying figure for the Venezuelan opposition. They claim her hardline positions have often handicapped the opposition and made it more difficult for the movement to come together around a moderate political position.
- Calling for foreign intervention: Some point to a 2018 letter Machado wrote to the prime minister of Israel and the president of Argentina, in which she asked them to apply their influence to "dismantle the criminal Venezuelan regime". Opponents, including some in Venezuela's National Assembly, have condemned this as a call for foreign intervention and military action.
- Alleged ties to foreign powers: Critics say Machado has used her influence to build relationships in Washington for more than two decades, with both Republican and Democratic support. Her critics claim that she is too closely aligned with certain U.S. interests and that her political activities are tied to conservative and far-right movements in Europe.
- Opposition to previous administrations: Some sources assert that Machado's long history as an activist and political operator has not always served peace. They cite her involvement in a voter rights group that led a failed effort to recall Hugo Chávez in 2004.
- Support for Israel: The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has condemned Machado's prize, citing her support for Israel and its Likud party, particularly regarding the bombing of Gaza. A Norwegian lawmaker has also objected to the prize, pointing to a cooperation document Machado signed with the Likud party.
- Comments on the "struggle of Israel": Critics point to resurfaced social media posts in which Machado has stated, "The struggle of Venezuela is the struggle of Israel" and has called Israel a "genuine ally of freedom." These comments have been criticized as being out of line with the Nobel's purpose, particularly in light of the ongoing conflict in Gaza.
- Impact on domestic change: Some political scientists and analysts doubt whether the Nobel Peace Prize will have a meaningful effect on Venezuelan politics. They point out that a prestigious award does not guarantee a transition to democracy and could even incentivize the government to further repress dissent.
- Timing and perception: The timing of the award, coming amid increased U.S. pressure on Venezuela and a controversial election, has also raised questions. Some perceive it as part of a larger political strategy rather than a purely humanitarian recognition.
